tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5019762.post110711280737819582..comments2024-02-03T08:42:33.927-05:00Comments on Threads of a Tatting Goddess: Testing and PlayingGinahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17127914310809216760noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5019762.post-1107313881558385162005-02-01T22:11:00.000-05:002005-02-01T22:11:00.000-05:00Hi Anonymous!
Yes, that's the same explanation I'v...Hi Anonymous!<br />Yes, that's the same explanation I've gotten.<br />Thanks!Ginahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17127914310809216760noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5019762.post-1107287533604308922005-02-01T14:52:00.000-05:002005-02-01T14:52:00.000-05:00Hey, Luuuucy--I got some 'splainin' for you...
I ...Hey, Luuuucy--I got some 'splainin' for you...<br /><br />I was taught (way back when) that the join counts as the first half of the ds; that way, all the rings would be the exact same size because they all have the same number of ds threads going around the core thread. I never thought it would be that big a deal (I was taught on size 80 thread) 'cause it didn't seem like one more thread would Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com